• Home
  • Browse
    • Current Issue
    • By Issue
    • By Author
    • By Subject
    • Author Index
    • Keyword Index
  • Journal Info
    • About Journal
    • Aims and Scope
    • Editorial Board
    • Publication Ethics
    • Peer Review Process
  • Guide for Authors
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Reviewers
  • Contact Us
 
  • Login
  • Register
Home Articles List Article Information
  • Save Records
  • |
  • Printable Version
  • |
  • Recommend
  • |
  • How to cite Export to
    RIS EndNote BibTeX APA MLA Harvard Vancouver
  • |
  • Share Share
    CiteULike Mendeley Facebook Google LinkedIn Twitter
Benha Medical Journal
arrow Articles in Press
arrow Current Issue
Journal Archive
Volume Volume 40 (2023)
Issue Special issue (Surgery)
Volume Volume 39 (2022)
Volume Volume 38 (2021)
Volume Volume 37 (2020)
Volume Volume 36 (2019)
Abuelnasr, M., Elgohary, H., A. Nuh, A., A. Elbegawy, M. (2023). Laparoscopic Suture versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal Rectal Prolapse. Benha Medical Journal, 40(Special issue (Surgery)), 211-223. doi: 10.21608/bmfj.2022.146010.1611
Mohamed I Abuelnasr; Hussein Elgohary; Abdirahman A. Nuh; Mohamed A. Elbegawy. "Laparoscopic Suture versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal Rectal Prolapse". Benha Medical Journal, 40, Special issue (Surgery), 2023, 211-223. doi: 10.21608/bmfj.2022.146010.1611
Abuelnasr, M., Elgohary, H., A. Nuh, A., A. Elbegawy, M. (2023). 'Laparoscopic Suture versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal Rectal Prolapse', Benha Medical Journal, 40(Special issue (Surgery)), pp. 211-223. doi: 10.21608/bmfj.2022.146010.1611
Abuelnasr, M., Elgohary, H., A. Nuh, A., A. Elbegawy, M. Laparoscopic Suture versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal Rectal Prolapse. Benha Medical Journal, 2023; 40(Special issue (Surgery)): 211-223. doi: 10.21608/bmfj.2022.146010.1611

Laparoscopic Suture versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal Rectal Prolapse

Article 16, Volume 40, Special issue (Surgery), January and February 2023, Page 211-223  XML PDF (707.99 K)
Document Type: Original Article
DOI: 10.21608/bmfj.2022.146010.1611
Authors
Mohamed I Abuelnasr email 1; Hussein Elgohary1; Abdirahman A. Nuh2; Mohamed A. Elbegawy1
1General surgery department, benha faculty of medicine
2general surgery department,benha Univ.
Abstract
Background; Over the last decades, numerous procedures have been proposed to treat rectal prolapse (RP) often with contrasting results, underlying the continuing search for the ideal surgical treatment. This should correct RP and/or rectal intussusception (RI) and derived symptoms. This study aims to evaluate and compare the functional outcome after laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy and laparoscopic suture Rectopexy for the surgical Treatment of Internal Rectal Prolapse. Subjects and methods; This was prospective study, was carried out in General Surgery Department of Benha University Hospital on 30 patients with internal rectal prolapse those randomly divided into 2 groups: (Group A): 15 patients who were proposed to do laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, (Group B): 15 patients who were proposed to do laparoscopic suture rectopexy. Results; Ventral Mesh Rectopexy operation time was highly significantly longer than Laparoscopic Suture. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding intra operative complications except one case of bleeding in LSR group. Conclusion; Both laparoscopic mesh rectopexy and suture rectopexy are feasible and reliable methods for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse associated with low recurrence rate, improvement of ODS symptoms and better anorectal function.
Keywords
Rectal prolapse; Rectopexy; Suture rectopexy; Ventral rectopexy
Statistics
Article View: 61
PDF Download: 76
Home | Glossary | News | Aims and Scope | Sitemap
Top Top

Journal Management System. Designed by NotionWave.